Battisford Beekeeping

Stowmarket Weekly Post, 20 Sep 1884, p8, c6

From the Stowmarket Weekly Post, 20 September 1906:

EXTRAORDINARY OCCURRENCE.—Some mild excitement was created at Battisford when it transpired that early on Monday morning the strong wind had blown down a hollow tree in which for some time there had been a nest of bees. Mr. J. Prentice, of Stone Cottages, bee-keeper, attempted to hive the angry host, but owing to the high wind was unsuccessful. The bees flew in all directions and were a source of danger to the pedestrians, many of whom were stung. Mr. Prentice ultimately procured assistance and removed the tree, which, with the bees, was destroyed by fire.

The ‘bee-keeper’, James Prentice, was born in Battisford in 1860. At the time of this ‘extraordinary occurrence’, James was 46 years old. He had been married to his wife, Sarah (nee Leggett) for 19 years but they don’t appear to have had any children.

The article states James lived at Stone Cottages which can be seen on a map published in 1884. The corresponding building on a modern map is now known as Stonecroft. It does not specify exactly where the disturbed bees were located – presumably nearer to the church where more ‘pedestrians’ are likely.

‘Stone Cottages’ on c1884 map

James was recorded only as an agricultural or farm labourer in the 1901 and 1911 censuses. This suggests his beekeeping was either a hobby or used for supplemental income to his meagre labouring wage.

A straw skep in a bee bole at Moseley Old Hall, Staffordshire via geograph.org.uk

Traditionally, people used straw skeps to keep bees, but by 1906 most beekeepers had moved on to wooden movable-frame hives. The wooden hives enabled easy access to the honeycombs without harming the bees. I suspect James Prentice’s set-up may have looked a bit like Mr A. Howard’s Apiary in Surrey – a photograph of which was published in The British Bee Journal in 1904. (First launched as The British Bee Journal and Bee-Keepers’ Adviser in 1873.)


James lived his entire life in Battisford. He died in 1919, aged 59, and was buried in Battisford churchyard. (The first burial in the cemetery was not until 1926).

Landlady Lucy

I found this charming article in the Suffolk Chronicle published 29 April 1882:

“A HAPPY FAMILY.—Last week the son of the landlady of the Barking Lion, whilst ploughing, turned up a nest containing five young wild rabbits, which he took home and handed over to the care of the family cat. This cat, being a mother at the time, was deprived of her kittens, and the rabbits were substituted. The cat has taken kindly to her new charge, and has proved a capital foster-mother. The happy family may be seen any day at the above inn.”
– Suffolk Chronicle, 29 April 1882, p6, c1

Suffolk Chronicle, 29 April 1882, p6, c1

The landlady of the Barking Lion (now considered part of Needham Market) was Lucy Overton (nee Mays). Her husband, Thomas Overton, became the licensee in 1880 but it seems that Lucy actually handled the day-to-day running of the pub, while Thomas continued to work as an agricultural labourer.

Barking Lion household on the 1881 census

In Victorian times, it was rare for married women to hold a license in their own name. Female licensees were most likely to be widows taking over the license from their deceased husbands.

The Barking Lion (with kind permission from Suffolk Pubs)

Lucy died in 1898 and by 1900 Thomas had transferred the license to someone else. Lucy must have been a well known resident since when Thomas died in 1916, he was described as “husband of the late Lucy Overton”.

Lucy is buried in Barking Churchyard. The epitaph on her gravestone reads:

“A LIGHT IS FROM OUR HOUSEHOLD GONE
A VOICE WE LOVED IS STILL’D
A PLACE IS VACANT IN OUR HOME
WHICH NEVER CAN BE FILLED”

Giving Up Housekeeping

Whilst looking for information on her daughter’s marriage in 1917, I stumbled across this intriguing advertisement in the newspaper placed by Alice Ann Glaister (nee White) the same year:

“TUESDAY, 27th NOVEMBER,
At 2 o’clock.
On the Premises, No. 17 Springhill road, Mornington (off Glen avenue).
Instructed by Mrs Glaister, who is giving up housekeeping…”

…followed by an impressive list of household possessions.

clipping of newspaper advertisement
Evening Star, 26 Nov 1917, p5

I had not heard the expression, ‘giving up housekeeping’ before but it seems to refer to a time when people are no longer able to maintain their own home and need to ‘give up’ or sell their possessions.

Alice’s husband was coachbuilder, William Glaister, who died 9 November, and was buried 11 November 1917. A couple of weeks later, Alice was auctioning off her household furniture and furnishings from her home at 17 Springhill Road – where the couple had lived since at least 1890. (Their daughter, Mary, had even married at the address earlier that year.)

Interestingly, the family had starting advertising the home to be let as early as 20 October 1917. William was suffering from stomach cancer and the family probably knew his time was coming to an end and so were making preparations for the future.

Otago Daily Times, 20 Oct 1917, p9

In 1933, 16 years after William’s death, Alice died ‘at the residence of her daughter, 616 Cumberland Street’. But which daughter? She had had seven daughters and two sons.

Evening Star, 25 Nov 1933, p12

Alice’s second youngest daughter, Ada, was recorded at the Springhill Road residence with her parents in 1914. Ada would remain a spinster so this seems an obvious choice of family member to live with.

However, electoral records show that the home she died in was that of her eldest daughter, Laura, who had married Alfred Burns in 1908. The electoral rolls show her living there with her husband in 1931 and 1935.

1935 electoral roll showing Laura and Alfred at 616 Cumberland Street

Why not Ada Victoria?

Alice and Ada had been recorded moving from place to place together since 1919.

  • 1919 – Hugh Street, Sawyers Bay (near Port Chalmers)  (daughter Barbara was nearby in Glendermid – possibly even the same house)
  • 1922 – 14 Maitland Street
  • 1925 – 8 Jones Street
  • 1928 – 8 Jones Street, then 117 Dundas Street
  • 1931 – 117 Dundas Street

14 Maitland Street appeared to be some kind of boarding house based on advertisements in the newspapers.

Evening Star, 6 Oct 1925, p7

8 Jones Street was let as a 4-room house in 1924 – perhaps this was the ad seen by Alice and Ada when planning their move from Maitland Street?

Otago Daily Times, 8 Jul 1924, p12

117 Dundas Street appeared to be owned (and lived in) by an Alfred Edwin Maitland and his family until at least 1949. There appears to be no family relationship to the Glaisters so perhaps they were simply renting a room?

In 1935, Ada was still at 117 Dundas Street and remained there for at least a few more years. This suggests she had not also been living in her sister’s house when Alice died in 1933. Ada may have had some form of employment which meant she could not care for her ailing mother, but no profession was given in the electoral rolls. Alice and Ada were described throughout the electoral rolls only as ‘widow’ and ‘spinster’, but this, along with, ‘married’, seemed to be the case for all the women on the page.

Although the phrase ‘giving up housekeeping’ had initially caught my attention, it led me to a valuable insight into my 2nd great grandmother’s life after her husband died and illustrated how much her circumstances changed. Alice went from having her own 7-bedroom home for about three decades, to moving between various rentals and boarding houses, possibly relying on her daughters for support.

A map of Alice Glaister’s residences from 1917 can be seen here.

A Patriarchal Family

 

Suffolk Chronicle, 22 October 1870, p5, c6

From the Suffolk Chronicle, 22 October 1870:

“A PATRIARCHAL FAMILY.—A family named Prentice, living in Flowton and Bricet, seems to be of remarkably good stuff. The hero of the quartette, Robert, living at Bricet, is 95; Henry and John, living at Flowton, are a couple of boys aged 89 and 82 respectively; and Mary, living at Bricet, is 77—the average age is 85 years, nine months.”

This little snippet about the Prentice family of Great Bricett and Flowton is very informative, although not entirely correct.

All four mentioned were baptised at Great Bricett. Robert was baptised 1781, Henry in 1786, John in 1791, and Mary in 1803 (although born in 1800). They all appear to be siblings but Mary’s parentage is unclear (father’s name not recorded).

Baptism entry of Robert Prentice in the Great Bricett parish register – 21 Jan 1781

Children were not always baptised soon after their birth (such as in Mary’s case) but in this case, Robert seems to have been. He was baptised early 1781 and considering his parents were married the previous year, 1780/1 seems a likely birth year.

This would make Robert 90 at the time of this article, not 95. Henry’s age was closer to 85 than 89; John’s was 79 rather than 82; and Mary’s was 70 rather than 77.

They probably did believe these to be the correct ages though, since they match the ages given 6 months later in the 1871 census. (Except for Mary, whose age was given as 73.)

All four died within 8 years of the article being published – Robert in 1871, Henry in 1874, John in 1875, and Mary in 1878.

Robert and Mary were buried in Great Bricett churchyard and Henry and John were buried at Flowton (about 4 miles southwest of Great Bricett).